![]() Since it is rarely susceptible to direct proof, actual intent is typically established through circumstantial evidence surrounding the allegedly fraudulent act. “Actual intent” to defraud must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. The burden of proving actual intent is on the party seeking to set aside the conveyance. In general, a party pleading a cause of action for fraudulent conveyance must allege specific facts, including, among other things, the identity of the specific transactions or conveyances that the plaintiff alleges were fraudulent. Very conveyance made … with actual intent … to hinder, delay, or defraud either present or future creditors, is fraudulent.… Whether the debtor transfers assets with intent to defraud or without fair consideration, the DCL provides creditors with a number of remedies. New York creditors often look to the Debtor and Creditor Law (the “DCL”), as well as the common law, to recover assets that have been (or may be) transferred by debtors to another party. Anti-Retaliation Under The SEC And CFTC Whistleblower Programsįraudulent Conveyance Claims Dismissed For Failure to Plead Fraud With Particularity Print Article.The Confidentiality Protections Under The SEC/CFTC Whistleblower Program.The Whistleblower’s Information Must Lead To a Successful Enforcement Action. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |